Home Finance Page 10

Finance

Nice Rebound: Stocks Bounce Back After Worst Day of 2013

Nice Rebound: Stocks Bounce Back After Worst Day of 2013

 

 
U.S. stocks rebounded back from the largest one-day sell-off of 2013 as investors cheered a comprehensive slate of economic reports and corporate results. 
 
The Dow Jones Industrial Average increased by more than 150 points, or 1.1 percent while the S&P 500 added 1.4 percent and the NASDAQ rose by 1.5 percent. This bounce back comes one day after all three indexes dropped significantly, following disappointing economic news out of China and the tragic events that occurred at the Boston marathon. 
 
Investors were optimistic as a result of housing statistics, which topped 1 million in the month of March for the first time since the summer of 2008. Building permits came in at a yearly rate of 900,000 in March, which was slightly less than forecast estimates but still solid. The positive housing numbers caused homebuilder stocks to spike as Hovnanian Enterprises added 1.6 percent, the PulteGruop rose more than 4 percent and Lennar increased by 2.4 percent. 
 
In addition to the housing sector, a number of companies reported strong earnings. Coca-Cola shares increased nearly 6 percent, leading gains on the S&P 500 and the Dow after the company shattered earnings and sales forecasts. In addition, Johnson & Johnson shares enjoyed modest increases after the company’s first quarter earnings also exceeded expectations.
 
Goldman Sachs also reported solid results; however, the banking giant’s shares slid roughly 2 percent as investors worried that Goldman was taking on too much risk to deliver robust earnings. 
 
Yahoo also reported earnings; the company’s revenue missed estimates, but still reported higher-than-expected numbers. Shares of Yahoo dropped slightly during after-hours trading. 
 
Gold also bounced back today following a dramatic 9 percent drop-off to a 2-year low. The price of gold gained roughly 2 percent, settling at $1,387.40 per ounce; other commodities featured mixed results.  
 
European markets closed with slight losses on concerns about slowing global growth while the Asian markets ended the day mixed. Also, the dollar dropped versus the pound and the euro, but increased versus the yen. 
 
 
Source: SEC.GOV

Underground Profits: The Lucrative World of Cigarette Smuggling

Underground Profits: The Lucrative World of Cigarette Smuggling

 

 
Cigarette smuggling is a hot new business as taxes rise in some states but remain marginal in others. Yes, the act of purchasing cigarettes in one state, then selling them in another is illegal; however, a truckload of cigarettes purchased down South can earn a smuggler upwards of $1,940,000 if they are sold in New York. And these lofty margins are what attract criminals into the underground world of cigarette smuggling. 
In 2011, roughly 65 percent of all cigarettes sold in New York were smuggled from another state, according to a free-market report think tank. This figure is up from roughly 36 percent in 2006. 
 
This illegal activity is not just taking place in New York; the Mackinac Center for Public Policy estimates that more than 15 states have smuggling rates that exceed 20 percent. Factor in counterfeit cigarettes from overseas, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives estimates lost government revenue at over $5 billion per year. 
 
Many involved in the legal sale of cigarettes blame rising state taxes for the exorbitant increase in illegal smuggling; these individuals estimate that things will get worse if President Obama’s proposed 94 cent per-pack cigarette tax increase goes through. 
The New York-Virginia corridor is the most popular arena for illegal cigarette smuggling as the considerable difference in taxes and the states’ relative close proximity make it an attractive route for smugglers. In the state of Virginia, state taxes are 30 cents per pack while in New York, they are a whopping $5.85—the highest rate in the United States. 
 
While the Virginia-New York corridor gets the majority of the attention, professionals tracking the situation claim that trafficking rings can run from any of the low-cost states to the high ones. North Carolina to Michigan and Virginia to California are also popular routes for smuggling. 
 
The quantity of smuggled and/or counterfeit cigarettes arriving from overseas, particularly from China, is also increasing. These knockoffs are particularly bothersome to the American tobacco companies, and could pose a significant risk to consumers. “You have no idea what’s in a counterfeit cigarette,” says a spokesman for Altria, which produces Marlboro and other cigarettes. Rabbit feces, rat droppings and dirt have all been observed in counterfeit cigarettes, says Sutton, who notes that manufacturing typically takes place in old factories, in caves or underground. 
Public health officials believe there is no reason to oppose Obama’s tax proposal.
 
Higher cigarette taxes encourage Americans to quit smoking; smoking rates decreased by more than 10 percent after the 62-cent-a-pack federal tax increase in 2009. Moreover, smoking costs society a large amount of money—nearly $200 billion a year in lost productivity and medical costs, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control. The dollar amount is peanuts; however, compared to the nearly 500,000 lives lost each year to cigarette smoke. 
 
 
Source: AP

Rocky Mountain Plunge: SEC Charges Denver Businessman with Insider Trading

Rocky Mountain Plunge: SEC Charges Denver Businessman with Insider Trading

 

 
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a wealthy Denver businessman with insider trading based on proprietary information he procured from the CEO of an oil company that was about to secure a prominent investment. 
 
An investigation by the SEC found that Scott Reiman procured inside information regarding Delta Petroleum before the company’s announcement that it had received a $684 million investment from private investment company Tricinda. Following the announcement of the investment, Delta Petroleum stock jumped almost 20 percent and Reiman reaped substantial profits. 
 
To settle the charges, Reiman agreed to pay roughly $900,000 and accept a barring from the securities industry and from services as a director or officer of a public company for at least five years. In addition to the charges filed against Reiman, the SEC also filed charges against Reiman’s source, then CEO Roger Parker, and a trader, Michael Van Gilder. 
 
“Reiman illegally took advantage of confidential information that he procured through his friendship with Parker and traded the company’s stock for significant and illegal profits,” said Daniel Hawke, Chief of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Market Abuse Unit. 
 
According to the complaint filed by the SEC, Reiman is founder and manager of the Denver investment firm Hexagon. Reiman received numerous tips from Parker regarding Tracinda’s investment in Delta Petroleum. On several occasions during the winter of 2007, Reiman purchased Delta stock or risky option contracts after speaking with Parker, including once within a few minutes after ending a phone conversation with Parker. 
 
The SEC charged Reiman with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; Reiman neither denied or admitted the charges filed against him. Instead, Reiman agreed to pay disgorgement of roughly $400,000 plus interest of nearly $94,000 and a penalty of $400,000. The charges also prohibit Reiman from serving as a director or officer of any public company for at least five years and from acting in any role within the securities industry. Reiman is awarded the right to apply for reentry into the industry after five years. 
 
 
Source: Sec.gov

Inflation is Extremely Low Right Now: Is it Time to Worry?

Inflation is Extremely Low Right Now: Is it Time to Worry?

 

Prices of common goods are not going up very much, but should we celebrate?

The answer to this inquiry is: not exactly. Inflation that is too low could be a terrible sign for the United States economy, and some officials within the United States Federal Reserve are starting to get concerned.

Talking with reporters on Wednesday, St. Louis Fed President Mr. James Bullard looked to the Fed’s favored measure of inflation—amount of personal consumption expenditures, minus energy and food—which has recently revealed that prices rose up 1.3 percent over one year ago.

“This figure is pretty low,” Bullard said at a Levy Economics Institute meeting. “I am getting concerned about this figure, and I think that provides the F.O.M.C with room to work-out its monetary policy.”

The Federal Reserve typically aims to keep inflation around 2 percent per year; inflation at this level is deemed healthy as it coincides with legitimate economic growth, a growing labor market and gradually rising wage rates.

“the history of our economy has shown that our markets perform best with slightly higher levels of inflations such as 2.5 or 3 percent,” said Bernard Baumohl, the chief global economist for the Economic Outlook Group. “Dormant or low inflation translates into a stagnant economy.”

There are a few key reasons as to why low inflation is a bad economic indicator. First, when companies do not have any leeway to raise price, they are more apt to cut costs, which would mean a reduction in their workforce or a cutback in hiring. Second, if inflation remains low, consumers are not as motivated to spend. Third, when inflation is low or dormant, it does not offer a considerable buffer against deflation if an economic event takes place. And lastly, low inflation often comes along with lower revenue growth and wages.

The Federal Reserve has kept its short-term interest rate close to zero since 2008. When this rate was not enough to boost the economy, it launched several bond-buying sprees in an attempt to lower long-term interest rates. The Fed is now operating its third round of asset purchases, buying over $85 billion in mortgage-backed securities and Treasuries each month. This program remains highly controversial, and many are speculating about when the Fed will start to ease its bond purchasing habits.

From Rogue Trader to Locked Up

From Rogue Trader to Locked Up

 

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission charged a former employee at a Connecticut brokerage firm with scheming to profit from placing unauthorized orders to purchase Apple stock. When the ploy backfired, it ultimately caused the firm to cease operations.

David Miller, an institutional sales trader, has agreed to a partial settlement of the SEC’s charges. Moreover, Mr. Miller pleaded guilty in a parallel criminal case.

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission alleged that Miller misrepresented to Rochdale Securities that a customer had agreed to the Apple order and assumed the risk of loss on the resulting trades. The customer order was to buy 1,625 shares of Apple, but Miller instead entered a number of orders totaling 1.625 million shares at a cost of nearly $1 billion. Miller was hoping to share in the customer’s profit if the trade proved to be profitable, and if the stock price dropped he would claim that he made an error on the size of the order. The shares of Apple would up decreasing after a poor earnings announcement later that day, and Rochdale was forced to halt operations in the wake of covering the losses suffered from the illicit trades.

“Miller’s scheme was brazen, deliberate, and ultimately poorly-conceived,” said Daniel Hawke, the Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit. “This is an alert and a wake-up call to the brokerage industry that unchecked conduct of even a single person in a position of trust can pose a tremendous risk on a firm and potentially to the broader markets.”

The complaint filed by the United States Securities Commission charged Miller with violations of Section 17 and 3 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. To settle these charges, Miller will be prohibited in SEC administrative proceedings from working in the securities industry or participating in any dealings or offerings of penny stocks. In the partial in-court settlement, Miller agreed to be enjoined from future violations of antifraud provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Moreover, a financial penalty will be assessed at a later date by the court system upon the SEC’s motion.

Source; United States Securities and Exchange Commission www.sec.gov

Social Media Shutdown: Wall Street Cracks Down on Facebook Posts and Tweets

Social Media Shutdown: Wall Street Cracks Down on Facebook Posts and Tweets

 

 
Several states in the U.S. have banned companies from monitoring employees’ social media accounts; however, FINRA wants to introduce an exception for financial firms. 
Despite a dozen or so laws that prevent the practice, a Wall Street regulator is seeking for wiggle room to keep close tabs on stockbrokers’ social network entries. 
 
The Financial Industry Regulation Authority, which is a self-regulator for brokerage firms, says investors must be protected; if brokers are chatting about stocks on Twitter and Facebook, FINRA is responsible for ensuring that they comply with Wall Street policies. 
 
These policies involve everything from requiring brokers to disclose conflicts of interests, to guaranteeing they are not recommending a stock in company forums and trashing the company via other mediums. In order to keep firms and stockbrokers in line with said policies, both the Unites States Securities and Exchange Commission and FINRA require broker-dealers to keep a detailed record of all “business communications.”
 
If brokers are using social media for these types of communications, FINRA claims that firms are required to access said social media accounts. At the beginning of this year, FINRA sent letters to 10 states whose laws banned such monitoring; states instituted these types of legislation after a number of instances where people were terminated because of ill-advised Facebook or twitter posts. 
 
“Banning access to social media accounts conflicts with a firm’s responsibilities to comply with federal requirements and threatens investor protection,” said FINRA in a letter released earlier this year. 
 
Supporters of the social-monitoring bans claim that the government is going down a slippery slope; these individuals opine that if your employer can check your Twitter or Facebook posts to make sure that you are abiding by the rules, what is to stop them from looking through your photos for incriminating evidence. 
 
Regulators understand the impact social media can have on an investor’s decision; however, figuring out how to manage social-media posts has the SEC and FINRA playing an ugly game of catch-up. 
 
 
Source: SEC.Gov

Stocks Bounce Back After Fake Tweet

Stocks Bounce Back After Fake Tweet

 

After briefly plummeting thanks to a fake tweet sent by the Associated Press saying there were explosions at the White House, stocks bounced back to end the day on a positive note.

The Associated Press said its Twitter Account was hacked, and stocks quickly rebounded. Meanwhile, positive readings on the housing market and strong earnings announcements by several companies overshadowed the disappointing news regarding the pace of global growth.

The S&P 500, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and the NASDAQ all closed roughly 1 percent higher.

Shares of the heavily shorted Netflix surged nearly 25 percent today, after the streaming video service reported robust subscriber gains on Monday.

Travelers Companies helped boost the DOW as shares climbed more than 2 percent after the insurer reported a substantial increase in profits. Moreover, shares of Coach surged over 10 percent after the retailer posted better-than-expected sales and earnings.

Airline companies were also making waves this week due to concerns regarding flight delays at airports resulting from the government’s forced sequester. That said, Delta Air Lines and US Airways shares rose nearly 5 percent after both companies reported stronger than expected first-quarter profits.

After the bell, Apple reported earnings that surpassed expectations, increased its quarterly dividend by 15 percent and boosted its stock repurchase program. Shares of Apple initially increased approximately 5 percent in after-hours trading, but the gains lost momentum and turned during the evening hours.

AT&T also reported earnings in the afternoon; the telecommunication giant’s earnings were in line with estimates, but revenues failed to meet forecasts. As a result, shares of AT&T fell in after-hours trading.

Earnings have been a primary focus this week as investors seek to grasp any good news they can; however, this does not mean economics concerns have disappeared. Markets are coming off the worst week of 2013 last week primarily due to tepid economic data. Many analysts expect the economy to show several more signs of slowing this spring as budget cuts and higher taxes impact consumer spending.

Investors; however, were greeted with a strong housing market news as the Census Bureau reported a rise in new home sales of 1.5 percent in March to a yearly rate of 417,000. This news boosted shares of a number of home builders, including Toll Brothers, the Pulter Group and Lennar Corp.

 

Cost of Living Index

Cost of Living Index

Changing Prices: Cost of Living Index


A cost of living index is a hypothetical price index that compares and measures the relative cost of living in regions or different times. The useful purpose of a cost of living index is its ability to measure the differences in the price of services and goods. It also allows for other items being substituted as prices vary.
There are a variety of methods that have been created in order to approximate a cost of living index, which includes different methods that allow substitution between items as relative prices change.
A cost of living index can affect many different things, including pension benefits, employee contracts, and government entitlements like Social Security. Often, the cost of living can cause adjustments to salaries annually based on geographic location.
Sometimes there are also yearly escalation clauses found in employment contracts can include future or retroactive percentage increases in salary which is not based on a cost of living index. These negotiated increases in salary are informally called cost of living increases or cost of living adjustments due to their similarity to other increases related to externally-determined indexes.
In the United States, there is the Consumer Price Index, which is derived from the idea of the cost of living index. The difference between the two is that the cost of living index measures changes in amounts that consumers spend over time on things such as clothing or food, but having a complete cost of living index could go further beyond this aspect and also describe changes such as environmental or governmental factors that have an effect on the well-being of a consumer.
The Consumer Price Index is a statistical estimate made based off the prices of a section or sample of a given item whose costs are periodically collected. Further divisions of sub-indexes and sub-sub-indexes are then generated for different categories as well as sub-categories of services and goods, being grouped to create the overall Consumer Price Index with weight adjustments reflecting their portion in the total of the expenditures by consumers.
It is one of many price cost of living indexes created by various national statistical agencies. The yearly change in percentage in the Consumer Price Index is used as an indication of inflation. It can be used to adjust for the effect of inflation in the actual value of salaries, pensions, wages, monetary magnitudes and price regulation in order to see changes in the actual values.
In most countries, the Consumer Price Index, as well as the USA National Income & Product Accounts and the population census, is one of the most carefully observed national economic statistics.

SEC Seeking to Halt Scheme that Raises Investor Funds under the Guise of the JOBS Act

SEC Seeking to Halt Scheme that Raises Investor Funds under the Guise of the JOBS Act

 

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission announced fraud charges against a Washington State-based company and its owner for defrauding investors with claims to raise billions of investment capital under the JOBS Act and invest it exclusively with domestic companies.

The SEC alleged that Daniel Peterson and his business USA Real Estate Fund 1 guaranteed investors that they could procure considerable returns from an upcoming offering in a product backed by prominent financial companies. Peterson told investors that the 2012 JOBS Act would allow him to raise billions by advertising the offering to the American public, and produce significant profits for early investors. Mr. Peterson took advantage of his investors’ sense of patriotism by promising to invest the funds of the offering in exclusively American companies, and help assist the state of Washington in their economic recovery.

The SEC alleges that Peterson utilized investor money for personal expenses, and is continuing to solicit investors in his scheme.

“We have brought these charges to stop Peterson’s illegal activity before his fraudulent plan picks up more momentum,” said Michael Dicke, the Associate Director in the SEC’s San Francisco Office. “The American JOBS Act is intended to aid small businesses with their capital raising efforts, not to legalize fraud or provide unscrupulous entrepreneurs with the right to make fraudulent claims to dupe investors.”

According to the complaint filed in a Washington federal court, Peterson sold common stock in his fund from November 2010 to June of 2012 to more than 20 investors in Washington and five other states. Through e-newsletters and e-mails, Peterson claimed that he was preparing to raise billions in a subsequent offering of “preferred” securities, which he claimed would yield 10-year returns of up to 1,300 percent. Peterson then claimed that two prominent financial firms had partnered with him to bring this offering to the marketplace and that the firms had conducted proper due diligence on his fund and were in the process of structuring pricing models and sales agreements.

All of Peterson’s claims were false; he never created an investment product, the stated returns were made up, and he has never had any affiliation with any Wall Street firm to underwrite his purported offering.

The SEC claims that Peterson used investor funds to pay his rent, entertainment, food, vacations and luxury vehicles. Peterson also is alleged of using investor funds on clothing, luggage, and expenses at a Las Vegas casino. 

Broke Doctors: Wait, What?

Broke Doctors: Wait, What?

 

 
As a considerable number of doctors struggle to keep their practices afloat, some are buckling under finance woes and pushed into bankruptcy
 
A bankruptcy filing among those in the medical field is a trend that has accelerated in recent years industry experts say, with potentially crippling consequences for patients and doctors. Some doctors are still able to keep their practices open post bankruptcy, but for others, the filing represents a career-ending event. 
 
Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings by medical professionals have spiked recently as noted by Bobby Guy, the co-chair of the American Bankruptcy Institute’s health care committee, who is responsible for tacking bankruptcy trends tied to distressed companies. Guy claims there were at least eight filings in the past couple of weeks, which he remarked as “highly unusual.”
 
Just five years ago, Florida-based bankruptcy attorney David Langley did not have a single medical professional as a client; however, since then he has handled at least six bankruptcy filings involving doctors. Two current clients—an OB/GYN and an orthopedic surgeon—also are in the midst of filing for bankruptcy. 
 
None of Mr. Langley’s clients were facing malpractice suits that forced them into dire financial situations; in fact, all regarded as top-notch doctors.
 
The struggling economy has taken a toll on doctors’ revenue as consumers cut back on elective procedures and office visits. Doctors also point to the shrinking insurance reimbursements, the rising costs of malpractice insurance and fluctuating regulations as impediments to maintain a steady practice. 
 
Primary care professionals are also facing similar challenges. Langley remembers one client, a solo doctor whose patients lacked insurance and were mostly on Medicare. As the economy weakened in the wake of the recession, fewer of this doctor’s patients could afford to make visits. As a result, cash payments and reimbursements plummeted. To come up with cash to keep the practice afloat, the doctor was forced to take a second job at a local hospital. The extra income; however did little as the doctor’s debt ballooned. 
 
Two years ago, state tax officials showed up at the doctor’s office to shut the clinic down. The doctor called Langley and was able to file an emergency bankruptcy suit online while the officials were pacing in the waiting room. The doctor gave the officials the bankruptcy case number, and they exited without closing the clinic. 
 
A similar medical professional was on the brink of bankruptcy in 2011; by 2010, she lost almost half of her patients causing her annual revenue to drop nearly 30 percent. This doctor hired Guy and was fortunate enough to restructure her debt and keep her business going. 
 
Every day since the filing has been a struggle, however. “Every time payroll comes around, I wonder if we will be able to keep this up,” she said. “I try not to think too much about it because it paralyzes me with fear.”
 
Source: CNN
 

Attorneys, Get Listed

X