Home Finance Page 7

Finance

Does Obamacare Help the Female Population?

Does Obamacare Help the Female Population?

 

With Mother’s Day behind us, President Obama spoke to a group of women—including a number of moms—about the ways the new Affordable Care Act is already providing aid to millions of Americans like them.

“The female population in particular has more control today over their own care than ever before,” the President of the United States said. “I am pleased to be joined today by many women who contacted us to describe what the Affordable Care Act does for them.”

Carol was just one of the women who contacted President Obama, and today, she introduced him in the East Room. Carol’s son, a recent college graduate and survivor of a traumatic brain injury, was able to stay on his family’s health care policy instead of being removed off the plan this year. Procuring coverage on his own would have been virtually impossible, as Carol mentioned to the President. “Given my son’s history, he would be uninsurable under the archaic set of laws. Instead of finishing law school, my resources and my son’s resources would have been channeled into somehow finding an insurance policy that would cover him.”

Carol and her son, according to the Whitehouse, are why the new Affordable Care Act lets you people stay on their parent’s healthcare plan until they reach the age of 26, President Obama said. 

Another woman named Alycia also spoke about the benefits the new laws bring to her family. “Alycia is the mother of Avey, who is a 3-year-old girl who is battling Leukemia,” President Obama explained. “Imagine what this is like for a parent. While you are just figuring out how to take care of a baby, you have to figure out how you are going to pay for expensive treatment that could save your baby’s life. This is why the Affordable Care Act made it illegal for unscrupulous individuals in the insurance industry to discriminate against children like Avey.”

President Obama mentioned a few more ways the Affordable Care Act is helping people throughout the United States. “Insurance companies can no longer impose lifetime limits on the amount of care you undertake, or drop you from coverage if you get sick, or discriminate against your children who have preexisting conditions,” President Obama said. “And women are now given access to free preventive care like mammograms, checkups, and cancer screenings, so you can evaluate and catch preventable illness on the front end. Because of this Act, seniors on Medicare can now receive free checkups and preventive care with zero deductibles or co-pay. These individuals also receive discounts on prescription drugs, which have already saved over 6 million seniors more than $700 each.”

Source: whitehouse.gov

SEC Issues Alert on Settlement Income or Pension Streams

SEC Issues Alert on Settlement Income or Pension Streams

 

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission, along with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority issued an investor alert for Pension or Settlement Income Stream Investments.

This alert informs investors about the risks involved when selling rights to an income stream or when investing in another entity’s income stream. The alert cautions investors who are considering an investment in settlement income streams or pensions to proceed with extreme caution.

Any individual receiving regular distributions form a settlement following a personal injury suit or a monthly pension may be targeted by corrupt salespeople who offer an immediate lump sum in exchange for rights to some or all of the payments you would be entitled to receiving in the future. Typically, recipients of a structured settlement or a pension will sign over said rights to some or all of their monthly payments to a factoring institution in return for a lump-sum figure; this figure is typically much lower than the present value of the future income stream.

“Investors must always educate themselves before making an investment decision, and this is of course true with respect to investing in a structured settlement product or a pension,” said the Director of the SEC’s Investor Education and Advocacy Division. “This alert intends to help investors understand the risks and costs associated with these transactions.”

The investor alert is equipped with a checklist of questions that you should go over before selling away an income stream:

·Is the transaction I’m about to undertake legal?

·Is the transaction worth the cost? You should locate the discount rate that the factoring company has applied to the income stream and compare the rate to alternatives such as a bank loan.

·What is the reputation of the institution offer the lump sum?

·Will the underlying factoring company require life insurance?

· What are the tax consequences if you undertake this transaction? The lump-sum payout offered by the factoring company may be taxable. 

SEC Charges Pennsylvania City for Making Fraudulent Public Statements

SEC Charges Pennsylvania City for Making Fraudulent Public Statements

 

 
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission charged the city of Harrisburg with securities fraud for misleading public when it issued statements regarding its financial situation. Officials for the city claim that the city’s financial condition was rapidly deteriorating and the public information made available to municipal bond holders was either outdated or incomplete. 
 
An investigation conducted by the SEC found that misleading statements were filed in the city’s budget report, mid-year and annual financial statements, and within the State of the City address. This case marks the first time that the federal agency has filed a complaint against a municipality for offering misleading statements outside of its securities disclosure filings. Harrisburg has agreed to settle the charges with the SEC.
The SEC found that the city of Harrisburg failed to comply with mandates to provide continuing financial information and audited financial statements for investors holding hundreds of millions of dollars in municipal bonds issued or backed by the city. As a result of the city’s non-compliance from 2009 to 2011, investors were forced to seek out the city’s other public statements in order to procure updated information about the city’s finances. However, insufficient information regarding the city’s fiscal situation was available elsewhere. Information that was publicized was offered on the city’s website; only the city’s 2009 budget, the 2009 State of the City address, and the 2009 mid-year fiscal report were available, but were either misstated or failed to disclose pivotal information regarding the city’s credit ratings and financial condition. 
 
According to the SEC, Harrisburg is close to bankruptcy due to the $260 million debt the city had guaranteed for repairs and upgrades to a resourced owned by the Harrisburg Authority. As of March of this year, the city has missed roughly $14 million in obligation debt payments. 
 
This investigation was conducted by prominent members of the EC’s enforcement division on municipal securities and the public pensions unit. 
 
 
Source: SEC.gov

Nearly 100,000 Borrowers Shortchanged in Mortgage Settlement

Nearly 100,000 Borrowers Shortchanged in Mortgage Settlement

 

 
Checks that were supposed to compensate mortgage borrowers who fell victim to illicit foreclosure practices have finally started arriving in mailboxes; however, many of these checks are well short of the amount owed. 
 
Due to a processing error, nearly 100,000 borrowers received checks for less than what they were owed in a settlement reached between the United States Federal Government and 13 mortgages servicers. 
 
Under the terms of the agreement, 4.2 million borrowers who foreclosed on their homes between 2009 and 2010 were deemed eligible for checks between $300 and $125,000, for a sum of roughly $3.6 billion in payments. 
 
The list of abuses filed in the suit included foreclosing on borrowers who were in the process of refinancing their mortgages; repossessing homes that were supposed to be protected under bankruptcy law; and foreclosing on active duty service members. 
The deficient payments were delivered to borrowers with mortgages serviced by former subsidiaries of Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. The two firms, which agreed on a settlement a few months after the original lenders had first reached a deal, had agreed to pay higher sums to borrowers.
 
However, Rust consulting, the company handing the issuance of rebate checks, applied the same compensation schedule to the clients of Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs as it did to those other financial institutions, resulting in shortfalls. “The servicers provided us with a list of borrowers and the categories of foreclosure abuse; we misapplied the payment amounts for the Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs borrowers,” said David Holland, the executive vice president at Rust Consulting. 
The consulting company did not offer specifics, but the differences in rebates could be significant. For instance, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs agreed to pay roughly $39,000 to borrowers who were wrongfully foreclosed when they were in fact protected under bankruptcy law. Under the settlement, approximately 110 borrowers were entitled to higher payments from Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. 
 
Most of the 96,000 individuals who received deficient checks; however, were slated to procure much smaller amounts; roughly 42,000 of Morgan Stanley’s and Goldman Sachs’ clients were set to receive $1,3000 because their mortgage provider ignored their request to modify their mortgage schedule. 
 
 
Source: whitehouse.gov

Young Men: The Exposed Age Group under Obamacare

Young Men: The Exposed Age Group under Obamacare

 

 
The Obama administration claims that the Affordable Care Act will provide cheaper health insurance for millions of Americans. However, young men who are not insured through their employers could their premiums spike once coverage in the state-based insurance exchanges starts in January. 
 
Several groups have come out with reports forecasting the impact to premiums, on average, in 2014. But just what individuals will pay for insurance on the individual market depends on several factors, including the enrollee’s age, income, gender, state of residence and current coverage level. 
 
“The average is not very relevant to any particular person,” said Jim O’Connor, an executive at consulting firm Milliman, who wrote a report on how “Obamacare” will impact premiums. 
 
The precise cost of plants likely will not be known until the summer, and possibly not until the exchanges open for enrollment in the fall. Insurers have already entered proposals to state officials, and regulators are currently reviewing them. However, it is up to each state to decide when to publicize plan specifics. 
 
Only a few insurers have disclosed their individual market prices for next year, but several have warned that they are likely to raise their prices significantly. In Maryland, for example, Blue Cross said its premiums can rise by up to 25 percent. 
 
That said, participants have the opportunity to choose from a variety of plans offered by a variety of different insurers. These plans from “bronze” plans with low premiums but higher-out-of-pocket costs to platinum plans that feature high premiums but cover more expenses. 
 
A key provision in the law is that those with pre-existing conditions cannot be charged more or excluded for coverage. Until now, the majority of cancer survivors and those with other ailments have faced difficulty procuring insurance. The new rule is therefore great for those who have been sick, but likely will be more expensive for the healthy people who procure insurance by raising the overall cost of coverage. 
 
 
Source: whitehouse.gov

Stuck in the Mud: Europe Facing Longest Recession in History

Stuck in the Mud: Europe Facing Longest Recession in History

 

 A long winter held back construction activity in Germany, which contributed to a sharper than expected drop in first quarter output across the Eurozone. German barely avoided recession at the start of this year, but its return to growth was not enough to prevent the Eurozone economy from contracting for a record sixth quarter in a row. 

Gross Domestic Product in the 17-country Eurozone dropped by .2 percent in the first quarter, largely due to France’s recent struggles. This compared to a decline of .6 percent in the fourth quarter. 

The region’s economy has failed to grow since the third quarter of 2011, making this the longest stretch of declining output in the history of the Eurozone. 

The pace of contracted eased up slightly in struggling Spain and Italy, but both economies still contracted by 0.5 percent in the quarter.

The prospects of a second consecutive year mired in a recession and tumbling inflation prompted the zone’s central bank to slash interest rates earlier this month to a record low of 0.5 percent. 

“An interest rate cut to 0.25 percent looks probable while the European Central Bank will also continue to evaluate the case for a negative deposit rate and ways of securing more credit to smaller companies,” said Howard Archer, the chief European economist at HIS Global Insight. 

The euro continue to slide against the dollar, and European stocks were weaker in early trading hours before recovering to roughly even. The recession has hurt business confidence, blown attempts to slash government debts, and has sent unemployment to record numbers. Many leaders within the European Union have signaled their willingness to ease austerity in the hope of shoring up a recovery that the majority of economists are still forecasting for later this year. 

However, Wednesday’s GDP estimate was far worse than economists were forecasting, largely due to poor growth in Germany. If the estimate proves to be accurate, the news could increase pressure on the European Central Bank to take further action to stimulate activity. 

Germany, which accounts for roughly 30 percent of Eurozone output, grew by only 0.1 percent in the quarter, as an unusually cold winter impacted construction activity. Analysts were expecting growth of roughly 0.3 percent in Europe’s largest economy. Investment and exports also dropped, underscoring the impact of the Eurozone recession and poor global growth. 

Source: Congressional Budget Office

Cost Cutters: Deficits in the United States Falling Faster than Expected

Cost Cutters: Deficits in the United States Falling Faster than Expected

 

Headed by Douglas Elmendorf, the United States Congressional Budget Office, projects this year’s deficit will be $200 billion less than it projected just a few months ago. That said, it’s not all good news over the next ten years or so. 

Annual deficits are dipping even faster than the Budget Office predicted back in February, and the nation’s total debt is expected to drop as share of the economy for a couple years. However, the downward trend will not persist since lawmakers have not implemented measures to address the long-term drivers of the nation’s debt. 

In its budget outlook released yesterday, the Congressional Budget Office now estimates the annual deficit for the fiscal year of 2013 to be roughly $642 billion or 4 percent of GDP. This is $203 billion less than the office estimated earlier this year. The office attributes the improved figure to higher-than-expected tax revenues and more payments to the Treasury by mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

By 2015, the United States’ deficit will drop to its lowest point in the decade (roughly 2.1 percent of GDP). Moreover, the deficit will remain below 3 percent until 2019, at which point it will begin to increase again. Deficits under 3 percent are regarded as sustainable because it signifies that budget shortfalls are not growing faster than the economy. 

In a similar fashion, the budget office estimates the country’s total debt—the sum of yearly deficits procured over decades—will dip to 71 percent of GDP in 2019. This figure is four percentage points below the present day. However, the debt will begin to climb higher again, reaching almost 74 percent by 2023.

“Budget shortfalls are expected to increase later in the coming decade, but because of the pressures of an aging population, increased health care costs and increased interest payments on the federal debt,” the Congressional Budget Office claimed in its report. 

The bulk of the deficit reduction that is expected to take place in the next few years will be the result of several measures that do not address said pressures. Specifically, the expiration of the payroll tax cut, increased tax rates on high-income homes, the sequester, and lower spending caps for defense and domestic programs between 2014 and 2021. 

In the meatime, the better-than-expected deficit for this year allows provides lawmakers with more time before they are required to raise the debt ceiling, which is the nation’s legal borrowing limit. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that Congress will need to render a decision regarding the ceiling in October or November. 

Source: Congressional Budget Office

SEC Charges China-Based Execs in Scheme to Divert Money for Personal Use and Overstate Revenues

SEC Charges China-Based Execs in Scheme to Divert Money for Personal Use and Overstate Revenues

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission charged husband-and-wife executives at a China-based business with engaging in a fraudulent activity to overstate the company’s revenues and divert funds from a securities offering for their personal use.

 
The Securities and Exchange Commission alleges that RINO International Corporation’s CEO David Zou and chairman Amy Qiu diverted $3.5 million in company funds to purchase a luxury home in Orange County, California without disclosing the transaction to investors. Conflicting information was offered to the company’s outside auditor when questions were posed about the transaction. Qiu and Zou also used proceeds to purchase automobiles along with clothing without recording them as personal expenses in the company’s public filings. 
 
The SEC imposed a trading suspension in 2011 against the company, which is a holding business for subsidiaries that install, manufacture, and service equipment for the Chinese steel industry. The trading suspension was implemented in response to questions regarding RINO’s public filings, and specifically their overstated revenues and false sales contacts.
 
Qiu and Zou agreed to settle the charges by paying penalties and consenting to multiple decade bars from serving as directors or officers of any publicly traded company in the United States. 
 
According to the complaint filed in federal court in Washington D.C., RINO’s periodic filings were littered with misleading and false information and omissions regarding the company’s operations and revenue from 2008 to 2010. The SEC claims that when RINO’s outside auditor discovered the $3.5 million diversion of funds by Qiu and Zou, the auditor was first informed that RINO intended to use the funds as a down payment for a business opportunity in the United States. When the auditor posed further questions, Zou alleged that he had authorized the use of the funds to buy property to serve as an office and temporary home for RINO’s employees. Eventually, Qiu and Zou agreed to reclassify the $3.5 million as a loan, and signed a promissory note bearing interest at current rates. Qiu and Zou then repaid the loan in May of 2010, using funds from a Chinese bank account. This money was then later wired back to an account in China. 
 
The complaint charges the business with violations of the anti-fraud, books, records, and reporting, and internal control provisions of the U.S.’ federal securities laws; Qiu and Zou agreed to pay penalties of $250,000 and the disgorgement amount of $3.5 million. 
 
Source: sec.gov
 

SEC Charges Traders in Enormous Kickback Scheme Involving Venezuelan Official

SEC Charges Traders in Enormous Kickback Scheme Involving Venezuelan Official

 

 
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission charged four individual with ties to a New York City brokerage in a scheme involving millions of dollars in illegal bribes paid to a high-ranking Venezuelan official to secure the bond trading business of a state-owned Venezuelan financial institution. 
 
According to the formal complaint filed in federal court in New York City, the global markets group Direct Access Partners executed fix income trades for customers in foreign sovereign debt. Direct Access Partners generated in excess of $66 million in revenue for their parent company from transaction fees on riskless principle trade executions in Venezuelan state-sponsored or sovereign bonds. A percentage of this revenue was illegally paid to the Vice President of Finance for the Social de Venezuela Bank. 
 
“These individual traders triggered a scheme that was staggering in scope and audacity,” said Andrew Calamari, the Director of the SEC’s New York Regional office. “These individuals thought they covered their tracks by using offshore bank accounts and a shadow accounting practice to monitor their illegal bribes and profits; however, they underestimated the SEC’s due diligence capabilities and tenacity in piecing their scheme together.”
 
According to the complaint, the scheme started in October of 2008 and continued through at least June of 2010. Bandes was a new customer to Direct Access brought in by Direct Access Global executives through their connections to Jose Hurtado, whom the SEC pinpointed as the intermediary between the firm and Hurtado. 
 
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission alleged that in January of 2010, the traders involved in the scheme and Gonzales arranged for two fraudulent trades with Bandes as both the buyer and seller. These trades caused Bandes to pay Direct Access Partners more than $10 million in fees, a large of percentage of which was transferred to Gonzalez for authorizing the blatantly illicit trades. 
 
Those named in the complaint are charged with fraud; the SEC is seeking final judgments that would require those named to return all ill-gotten profits with interest and pay financial penalties.  
 
 
Source: sec.gov

Slashing Costs: U.S. Deficit Plunges by a Whopping 32 Percent

Slashing Costs: U.S. Deficit Plunges by a Whopping 32 Percent

 

 
The United States’ annual deficit has dropped 32 percent over the first seven months of the fiscal year compared with same period last year, according to a report issued by the U.S. Congressional Budget Office. The primary reason why our nation’s deficit dropped so drastically: a significant jump in tax revenue. 
 
Tax collections rose by an astounding $220 billion or 16 percent between the start of the fiscal year on the 1st of October through April 30th. Payroll and individual taxes accounted for nearly $185 billion of this increase. 
 
The tax haul increased sharply primarily because salaries and wages were higher, the fiscal deal formulated over New Year’s raised tax rates on the highest earners, and because of the payroll tax cuts over the past two years. Moreover, according to the United States Congressional Budget Office, spending dropped nearly 2 percent year over year. 
 
The most significant percentage decrease occurred in the payment of unemployment benefits, which dropped nearly 25 percent, or $15 billion. Defense spending also decreased by nearly 5.5 percent or $20 billion, and “other spending activities”—primarily spending on non-defense related programs—fell nearly 8.6 percent or $58 billion. 
 
Spending in some programs or categories; however, was slightly up. Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security outlays for example rose by a combined $50 billion or 6.5 percent. 
 
The United states has managed to rack up an estimated $489 billion in debts over the first seven months of the year; however, this figure is roughly 33 percent less than the $720 billion recorded over the same period last year. 
 
Later this month, the United States Congressional Budget Office is expected to publish new estimates for taxes, spending, and deficits over the next decade. Earlier this fiscal year, it is estimated that the annual deficit for 2013 will hover around $845 billion; however, many budget experts expect the deficit for this year will come in far lower than this figure. 
 
 
Source: whitehouse.gov

Attorneys, Get Listed

X