Home Finance Page 17

Finance

Binary Options

Binary Options

What are Binary Options?
In finance, binary options are a specific type of option where the payoff can either be a fixed amount of the asset or just nothing at all. Binary options come in two different types, cash-or-nothing binary option and asset-or-nothing binary option.  In a cash-or-nothing binary option, the option pays a fixed amount of money if it expires in-the-money. On the other hand, the asset-or-nothing binary option pays the amount of the underlying security of the option. Thus, both options are binary in nature since there are just two different possible outcomes. These two binary options are also called to as all-or-nothing options, digital options, or fixed return options.
Like a typical vanilla European or American style option, binary options are described by their strike price, maturity date, and underlying reference unit, instrument, commodity or security price.  Binary options are sold for a premium payment made upfront, like other options.  Calls and puts are both available for binary options.
Binary options are characteristically sold and bought in over the counter markets between different financial hedge funds, institutions, large trading partners, and corporate treasuries. Binary options are highly used when the underlying instrument at hand is a rate, event, commodity, currency, or index.  
Binary options can be widely to hedge weather events, like hurricanes, rainfall, or temperature. This is because many transportation and agricultural companies can be heavily affected by the weather conditions.  Since the weather is very unpredictable and hard to measure, it makes it the perfect opportunity for binary options since it lets the binary option seller to assume a set amount of risk associated to the happening of a future event that is impossible to predict. 
Binary options can also be traded on inflation figures, like the Consumer Price Index or the Producer Price Index in the U.S.  These values are reported rather infrequently based on sampling methods done independently, and are typically revised after they are first released once certain input values are further proved.  There is no continuing stream of prices since inflation is not actually a traded instrument.  Without the continual input prices, it is extremely very difficult to mark-to-market binary options, whose values are strongly dependent on the dense volatility and price data.  Binary options allow the buyer to get inflation protection, while at the same time providing the binary option seller with a limited risk in the case where that inflation drops or jumps unexpectedly.
Lastly, binary options are extremely popular in foreign currency markets.  Often, emerging market currencies are subject to quick jump risk resulting from economic or political instability, or just due to the comparatively small volume of foreign trade.  Cultured currency speculators use low-rate developed economy currencies like the USD or EUR and invest them in high-rate market currencies, and then purchase the binary options as a means of protection against any currency risk.  This allows the binary option speculator to earn some profit while protecting being protected from jump risk.

Economy Much Worse Than We Think

Economy Much Worse Than We Think

 

The Great Recession of 2008 may have officially ended during the summer of 2009, but many Americans are pessimistic about the overall state of the economy, according to a national survey conducted by the John Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers University. 

Nearly 1,110 unemployed and employed Americans participated in the survey which was conducted between January 9th and January 16th of this year. Mark Szeltner, the survey’s lead researcher joined various discussions and national talk shows to discuss the date, and what it reveals with regard to the national psyche. 

Here are a few of the survey’s key statistics:

· 80% of Americans are skeptically that employment and career opportunities will be better for the upcoming generation

· More than half of Americans expect the economy to reach a full recovery from its collapse in six years and 29% of Americans do not expect the economy to fully recover

· Almost 75% of Americans were directly impacted by the financial collapse. Those in the survey  had either lost a job, or a family member had been out of work because of the recession

· The majority of participants said college or secondary education would become unaffordable for the average American · More than half of those surveyed have fewer savings than before the economic collapse

· More than half of those surveyed who lost a job said they are now forced to cut-back on doctor visits or medical treatment.

· Roughly 40% of Americans were forced to borrow money from friends or family because of the economic downturn

· Nearly one quarter of those who participated said they have sought professional help for depression or stress as a result of the recession

Even with the national unemployment rate falling from its peak of 10% in October of 2009 to its current 7.9% levels and even with the nearly 3-years of consecutive private-sector job growth, the survey’s information speaks to the magnitude and scope of the recession. In summation, the survey reveals a depressing image of what’s happening to many Americans as a result of the economic collapse.

Resistance

Resistance

When discussing trading of financial instruments one of the indicators that a trader will look at is the resistance and support levels.  Resistance levels are those price levels that indicate that a stock has hit a virtual ceiling and the price will begin to come down.  Resistance in a stock trading situation is kind of like an upside down trampoline.  When the resistance level is reached it will cause a “bouncing” affect where the price of the financial instrument will begin a downward decline.  
The opposite of resistance is support.  A support level is a level where once a financial instrument drops to a specific level the trend of the financial instrument will indicate that that reaching that price level will cause the stock to start an upward tick.  Resistance levels are found by looking at financial instruments closing prices over the course of a number of months or years.  When you find a price range that tends to trigger a downturn in stock price it can be used as a resistance level.  Once a stock hits its resistance level it has a tendency to take a downturn until it reaches its support level.  The support level will do the opposite and cause the stock price to go up.  
Traders tend to use the resistance and support levels as an indicator of when to buy and sell their financial instruments.  When a financial instruments trading price is rising and about to reach a resistance level it will usually be treated by the investor as a time to sell the instrument.  In contrast, when a stock price is dropping the investor will wait until the stock price reaches a support level and buy the stock.  
Just as in any other form of trading these resistance and support levels are not definite.  Even though there is a pattern that a trader will follow in making these decisions the stock price may reach the resistance level and keep going until it hits a new resistance level and is pushed back down.  In the converse a stock price may drop farther than its support level until it reaches a lower support level and is bounced back upwards.

MACD

MACD

MACD stands for Moving Average Convergence Divergence.  This is a mathematical tool that traders use to predict fluctuations in the stock market or other markets involving financial instruments.  The MACD is comprised of two different Exponential Moving Averages, one long term and the other short term, for the same stock.  An exponential moving average is a moving average where the earlier dates in the moving average are weighed less than those that are more recent. 
When creating a MACD the longer Exponential Moving Average is usually around 26 days while the shorter Exponential Moving Average is 12 days.  The two EMAs are plotted on a graph with the resulting EMAs hovering close to each other around zero.  The MACD on a chart consists of a MACD signal line, the Exponential Moving Average and the MACD histogram.  The MACD histogram is a bar graph that charts the differences, positive or negative, in value between the 26 day EMA and the 12 day EMA.  
MACD is often used by traders to reach determinations on when to get involved with a stock or when to exit from trading in that asset.  When the short term, 12 day, Exponential Moving Average rises above the slower moving long term, 26 day, Exponential Moving Average it is called a convergent movement.  This is often an indicator that positive trends show it is a good time to invest in that particular asset.  When the short term Exponential Moving Average is lower than the long term exponential moving average then you have a divergent movement.  This trend is usually used as an indicator of it being a good time to sell the asset .
Studies seem to indicate  that the MACD is not a reliable tool for entry or exit signaling, like it is supposed to.  Many times it is found that the MACD will remain steady and upon a slight divergence it will indicate an exit signal where in reality it is just a minor lull that is, in fact, a minor bump prior to a major up tick.

Moving Average

Moving Average

A moving average is a tool used by investors in the stock market, and the purchase and sale of other financial instruments, that track trends and momentum in the market.  A moving average is created by taking a set number of data points, representing the closing price of a particular stock on a particular day, and averaging them to create vector showing the way the financial instrument has traded over a period of time.  For example, if you wanted to create a moving average for a particular stock over the past month you would take the closing price of the stock for the last 30 days; add them together; and divide by 30.  This will give you the moving average. 
If you were to continue to add to this average over a course of time the data points would become more and more diluted and tend to make the average meaningless.  The moving average corrects this by deleting the last data point in the sequence for every addition to the moving average.  For example, if you have a 30 day moving average, on the second day of your moving average you will delete day 1 as you add day 31.  In how the definition of “moving” average comes about.  
An investor can create a moving average for any amount of time he, or she, wishes.  The goal in creating different moving averages of different lengths is to track short and long term trending of a particular financial instrument.  Moving averages at or below 20 days are categorized as short term moving averages.  Those between 20 and 100 days are considered to be medium term where above 100 are long term.  Depending on the type of trading you are involved in you will want to design your moving average in a way that will be most beneficial to you.  A day trader may want a moving average that recomputes every 50 minutes where someone looking at blue chip stocks may want to look at trends over a 300 day period.
There are two main types of moving averages.  There is the simple moving average, SMA, and the exponential moving average, EMA.  The simple moving average is prevalent amongst beginning investors in that it is, by its name, simple to compute.  The Simple Moving Average is computed by weighing each data point equally.  In contrast, the Exponential Moving Average is computed by weighing the most recent data points more heavily than those from farther in the past.  The Exponential Moving Average is considered to be more reliable and better reflects current market trends.  

Workforce Investment Act

Workforce Investment Act

What is the Workforce Investment Act of 1998?
The Workforce Investment Act of 1998 was passed as Public Law 105-220 by the 105th Congress.  It preamble states:
To consolidate, coordinate, and improve employment, training, literacy,   and vocational rehabilitation programs in the United States, and for other purposes.
As stated, the intention of this law was to replace existing federal job training schemes with standardized workforce development legislation that works in partnership with small businesses to improve worker education and advancement.  The funds are allocated on a state-local level with local areas receiving 85% of funds and the remainder funding state-wide programs.
Who gets covered under the Workforce Reinvestment Act?
Adults and Dislocated Worker get priority status under the Workforce Reinvestment Act to enable them to find or keep their jobs by developing critical skills that increase their employment value and long term prospects.  Vocational training is a major component of this initiative by targeting adults that lack a post-secondary education and the even smaller number of “basic skills deficient” adults.  Adults living on public assistance or low incomes receive priority for educational and training services.
Low income youth are also target by this Act and obtain the skills and training they need to enter the workplace.  There is a mandatory allocation of 30% of funds to help youth 14 – 21 not currently attending school.  Services provided to youth include tutoring, internship and skills training.

Sources:
https://www.doleta.gov/usworkforce/wia/Runningtext.cfm
https://www.doleta.gov/regs/statutes/wialaw.txt

Workforce Investment Act Text

Workforce Investment Act Text

 

 

Title I – Workforce Investment Systems
 
 
This section defines the terms to be used throughout the bill and contains key definitions such as “basic skills deficient” to indentify individuals below and 8th grade standard of reading, math and writing skills.  There are 53 definitions that qualify terms used to refer to the specific circumstances of workers that require training and the organizations that may train them.  The key provision of the Workforce Investment Act is that the training and administration happen on a local level, so as to better indentify and understand key areas were the workers are skill deficient.
 
 
Chapter 1 provides for the establishment of State Workforce Investment Boards, created by the governors of each state to direct policy related to the Workforce Investment Act.  The text stipulates that the board represent a variety of economic interests and areas of the state.  The State Workforce Invest Boards are responsible for assessing the viability and success of the program and preparing annual assessments on the progress of employee training.  These reports must identify the needs of the state in terms of skills and opportunities for workers.  The State must also develop procedures for the disbursement of federal funds and work in consultation with local officials.  Additionally the state has the right to administer drug tests to program participants and sanction offenders as necessary.
 
 
Chapter 2 deals with Local Investment Areas and how state authorities, with consultation from the State board and local officials might designate these areas.  The text of the law suggests basing these areas around educational institutions, areas with high demand for skilled labor and accessibility to the most amounts of potential workers.  This area is subject to performance evaluation so as to maximize the funding allocated to training workers.  Local Investment Areas may encompass the entire state if that state is “small” as defined in the text of this bill.
 
 
There must be an additional Local Workforce Investment Board to administer to the Local Investment Area with the funding allocated by the State Board.  As stipulated in Sec. 117, this board must include local business leaders, executives and educational officials, representatives of labor organizations and elected officials.  This board is also tasked with oversight responsibility to ensure the maximum efficiency is attained in the disbursal of funds to various training programs.  These boards must also develop a “local plan” that describes the:
 
 
Workforce investment needs of businesses, jobseekers, and workers in the local area
 
 
The current and projected employment opportunities in the local area
 
 
The job skills necessary to obtain such employment opportunities
 
 
The report must also include assessments of services available to displaced and unskilled workers and the success of community youth programs.
 
 
Chapter 3 and 4 provide for the consolidation of services into a “one-stop“option for convenience and administrative efficiency.  It sets out regulations that define organization eligible to provide job training, youth activities and other organizations eligible for workforce investment funds.  For example, provisions on youth activities recommend that eligible organizations provide training, mentoring and emotional support.  Program elements should include tutoring, summer employment, leadership development and counseling.  The identification of these elements are key for the board to decide on disbursing funding and the law goes into great detail about what organizations involved in workforce investment must achieve.
 
 
Title I also provides for national job programs such as Job Cops, Migrant and Seasonal Worker skills development and specialized programs for Native Americans.  There are provisions to provide technical assistance to individual states and to initiate pilot programs for future use.
 
 
Title II – Adult Education and Literacy
 
 
This part of the Workforce Reinvestment Act is a joint governmental initiative to increase literacy amongst adults so that they may improve their lives and the education potential of their children.
 
 
Individuals covered by Title II are 16 or older, are not enrolled in secondary school, lack the English proficiency or necessary educational skills to function as effective members of society.  Title II provides funding for organizations that work to increase adult literacy and a parent-child educational relationship.  Grants are disbursed on the basis of a number of eligibility requirements with some restrictions on geographic location and population served.
 
 
There is an accountability system to measure if participating organizations are performing up to standard and making a meaningful impact on adult illiteracy.  Like Title I, the local and state governments must produce plans for the disbursement of funds and ensure that the program operates as intended.  Local administration is key to Title II and educational institutions apply for grants on the local level.
 
 
Remaining Sections
 
 
The remaining three titles provide for the establishment of national statistics to track the progress of the Workforce Reinvestment Act and provide incentives for states to meet federal standards for program success.  There are provisions for a national Job Corps that aims to place qualified in employment opportunities that provide for long term skills growth.  Lastly, emergency fund are set up to deal with disaster areas that may need to administer to dislocated workers in times of crisis.
 
 
Strengths of the Workforce Reinvestment Act
 
 
The primary strength of the Workforce Reinvestment Act is the local synergy of business, education, labor and political leaders to develop strategies to administer federal funding.  An appropriate amount of regulation and administration is in place to prevent waste and abuse and the annual reporting on the progress and status of funds spent by the program enable the federal government to keep track of the program budget.  Local determination helps tailor each program uniquely to meet local labor market needs that in turn benefits the long term prospects of local businesses and industry.
 
 
The “one stop” concept is also a useful administrative practice and encourages administrative efficiency in the disbursement of funds and relevant services to unskilled workers.  The literacy programs of Title II represent long term investments in educational capital by increasing the proficiency of adults, with hopes that this has a residual effect on the literacy and education of their children.

 

 

Dodd-Frank Act

Dodd-Frank Act

 

DODD-FRANK ACT TEXT

What is the Dodd-Frank Act?

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was a bill that was drafted by Representatives Barney Frank and Chris Dodd.  It was passed by the Democratic controlled Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2010.

Background

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act came about in response to the financial collapse of 2007 that led to, what is commonly known as, the Great Recession.  The Great Recession was caused in large part because of two factors.  The first being the de-regulation of the banking industry and the second being the sub-prime mortgage crisis and the high risk associated with mortgage backed securities. 

 A report documenting the financial collapse found that the financial meltdown was the result of a number of factors including: high risk, complex financial products; undisclosed conflicts of interest; and the failure of regulators, the credit rating agencies, and the market itself to monitor Wall Street.  The failure of credit reporting agencies to monitor the mortgage-backed securities and  the 1999 of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 effectively removed the separation that previously existed between Wall Street investment banks and depository banks. 

THE GLASS STEAGELL ACT OF 1933 & ITS REPEAL

The Glass Steagall Act of 1933 was promulgated as a reaction to the Great Depression.  The Act  created a separation of bank types and prevented the banking industry from dealing in high risk ventures.  

In 1999, in a Republican controlled Congress, the act was repealed.  The reasons for its repeal were to stimulate growth in the banking industry.  The arguments included the fact that other nations did not regulate their banking industry in this manner and, as such, American banking institutions were losing market shares.

A direct result of the de-regulation of the banking industry was that institutions, such as Citi-Group, were permitted to underwrite and trade mortgage-backed securities.  

MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES

Mortgage backed securities involved high-risk investment in real property.  Mortgages were taken by banks and the banks subsequently pooled the mortgages into the form of securities.  The issue with this was that there was no oversight of the matter; due to the repeal of the Glass Steagall Act of 1933.  Banks were quick to compete in this newly established market and as such they were involved in riskier mortgages.  Consumers, who would not otherwise purchase homes, were able to do so under sub-prime mortgages.  The banks did not evaluate whom they should be giving mortgages too.  Sub-prime mortgages gave people the impression that they were paying a small interest payment on their mortgage only to realize later that the interest rate would skyrocket after a certain period of time.  As a result, many people began defaulting on their homes; often abandoning them in the middle of the night.  

Result of the financial collapse

Over 100 mortgage lenders went bankrupt during 2007 and 2008. Concerns that investment bank Bear Sterns would collapse in March 2008 resulted in a sale of the company to J.P. Morgan Chase.  Other banks that went bankrupt do to the financial collapse included Lehman Brothers, Merrril Lynch, Washington Mutual, Wachovia and AIG.  The Federal government also took control of the, lending institutions, Freddie Mac and Fannie May

As a result the Federal Government issued a bank bailout.  In 2008 the United States government approved a $700 billion to buy troubled mortgage-backed securities in the hope of reining in a possible global depression.  Included in the bailout, known as TARP, the federal government loaned billions of dollars to banking industries in order to prevent the collapse of the banking industry.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was passed in response to this crisis.  The Act's goal was to accomplish 3 things:  regulate the banking industry, heighten consumer protection against banking and credit card institutions, and institute whistle blowing policies.

The oversight of the banking industry was rationalized based on the idea that the banking industry has high incentives to invest in high risk ventures that go against the best interests of the public.  Part of the Dodd-Frank Act was to eliminate the ability of the federal government to bailout the banking institutions.  The rationale was that if the banking industry knows it will be rescued by the federal government then they are more inclined to invest in high risk ventures.

The Frank-Dodd Act went further to regulate banking industry.  The Act created many new agencies and strengthened others.  The Frank-Dodd Act included a number of consumer protection rules and created a consumer protection bureau that handled oversight of the banking and credit card industries.  Its goal is to hold credit card companies accountable for usurious actions.  Part of the reforms made under the name of consumer protection include the disclosure of information to the customer, including the impact of interest rates on the balance of a credit card and the curtailing of predatory overdraft fees in the banking industry. 

The Frank-Dodd Act also enhance whistle blowing incentives to wall street employees.  Under the Frank-Dodd Act individuals who blew the whistle on illegal and fraudulent behaviors on wall street could be subject to as much as 30% of total penalties against a firm if the allegations lead to a securities fraud conviction.

In all, the Frank-Dodd Financial Recovery and Consumer Protection Act categorized into sixteen titles and by one law firm's count, it requires that regulators create 243 rules, conduct 67 studies, and issue 22 periodic reports.

To read the text of the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform and Consumer Protection Act pleas go to 

https://docs.house.gov/rules/finserv/111_hr4173_finsrvcr.pdf 

 

Bank Secrecy Act

Bank Secrecy Act

The Full Facts on the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970
The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, also called the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act or just the BSA, is an act that requires all financial institutions within the United States to assist all United States government agencies in detecting and preventing money laundering that may occur.
The primary purpose of the Bank Secrecy Act, besides making money laundering a more difficult task to propagate, is to act as a preventative measure against banks somehow becoming intermediaries unknowingly in illicit activity. The Bank Secrecy Act, anti-money laundering sections requires businesses to maintain records while also filing reports that have a high degree of practicality in when dealing with tax, regulatory, and criminal matters. The requested documents which are filed by institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act compliance requirements are strongly used by both international and domestic law enforcement agencies to detect, deter, and identify money laundering from occurring whether the activity is in continuance of terrorism, tax evasion, criminal enterprise, or other illegal activity.
The Bank Secrecy Act was passed originally in 1970 by the United States Congress. Since then it has been amended many times, for example to include the provisions found in title III which is found in the USA Patriot Act.

The Provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970
In order for the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training to help prevent money laundering in the financial industry, the Act requires all financial institution to maintain detailed records regarding cash purchases as well as file reports regarding cash purchase of negotiable instruments that are no less than $10,000. Any purchases or transactions that are $10,000 or more from one customer must be reported to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Department of the Treasury. More specifically, these transactions are reported if one is above the minimum limit, or multiple related transactions are greater than or equal to $10,000 and happen within a 24-hour period.
These transactions must also be done in cash, meaning they are in a currency (both bills and coins) made from either the United States or other countries, or if they are a monetary instrument defined in the Bank Secrecy Act, such as bank drafts, cashier’s checks, money orders, or traveler’s checks. Personal checks do not apply to this definition of cash.
Furthermore, under the Bank Secrecy Act, these companies are also obligated to report any suspicious activity that may imply tax evasion, money laundering, or any other criminal activities on the part of a company. Because of the Bank Secrecy Act, many banks have ceased selling negotiable instruments the instruments are bought with cash, and instead require the purchase to be taken out from an account at the given institution.
An activity is thought to be suspicious if the transaction involves $5,000 or more in assets or funds that the financial institution thinks may possibly indicate a profit derived from an illegal activity or transacted with the intent of hiding an illegal activity. Besides traditional financial institutions like brokers or banks, there are many other institutions that are required to report any activity that is suspicious under the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, such as casinos, businesses that redeem or issue money orders, and dealers who deal gemstones or precious metals.
Affected Transactions under the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970
There are three major transactions that are affected under the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training.
Currency Transaction Report 
A currency transaction report, or CTR, is a report that must show all cash transactions that exceeded $10,000 within the same business day. The value or amount that exceeds $10,000 should be either in one single transaction or in a combination of related cash transactions. These currency transaction reports are filed with the records of the Internal Revenue Service.
Monetary Instrument Log 
The monetary instrument log must explicitly state the cash purchases involved for monetary instruments, for example cashier’s checks, travelers checks, and money orders, that have a value totaling inclusively between $3,000 to $10,000. A Monetary instrument log form is needed to be maintained on the record at the financial institution, and should be produced at the request of an examiner or audit to verify the institution’s compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training. A financial institution must also maintain this log for at least 5 years.
Suspicious Activity Report
The suspicious activity report must report any transaction made with cash where the customer appears to be trying to make an active effort to avoid the reporting requirements placed by the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training by not filing any currency transaction reports or monetary instrument logs. An example of when a suspicious activity report must be used if the actions of a customer suggest that he or she is laundering money or in some other way violating a federal criminal law while committing wire transfer fraud, check fraud or other mysterious disappearances. A bank must not let a customer know that a suspicious activity report is being filed against them. These suspicious activity reports are filed by the banks with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
The Effect of Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 on United States Citizens
Currency transaction reports include the bank account number, name, social security number, and address of the individual. The suspicious activity reports, which are required by the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training when transactions suggest suspicious behavior that try to elude currency transaction reports (or other types of suspicious behavior), include a bit more detailed information and typically contain efforts of covert investigation on behalf of the financial institution in order to gauge the nature or validity of the transactions.
One single currency transaction report filed for the account of a client is usually not concerning to the law enforcement authorities, but multiple currency transaction reports that come from different institutions or a suspicious activity report can suggest that the activity might be suspicious.
Under the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training, a financial institution cannot inform a consumer or business that a suspicious activity report is being filed against them. In addition, all the reports that are mandated by the Bank Secrecy Act are exempt from having to be disclosed according to the provisions found in the Freedom of Information Act.
Businesses that primarily deal in cash, such as restaurants or bars, can be exempted from the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training’s policy of having their withdrawals and deposits reported on currency transaction reports, although the exemption is hardly ever granted. Instead, many banks have computer systems that can retain information on currency transaction reports and allow duplicate currency transaction reports to be easily created.

Individual filing requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970
Under the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training, a United States citizen must file a FBAR if the individual has had a financial authority over, or interest in a foreign bank account that at any point in a year has an aggregate value of $10,000. Furthermore, a citizen must report this account on the Schedule B portion of the Internal Revenue Service’s Form 1040. The required FBAR should be separately filed with the United States Treasury before June 30.
The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, also called the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act or just the BSA, is an act that requires all financial institutions within the United States to assist all United States government agencies in detecting and preventing money laundering that may occur.
The primary purpose of the Bank Secrecy Act, besides making money laundering a more difficult task to propagate, is to act as a preventative measure against banks somehow becoming intermediaries unknowingly in illicit activity. The Bank Secrecy Act, anti-money laundering sections requires businesses to maintain records while also filing reports that have a high degree of practicality in when dealing with tax, regulatory, and criminal matters. The requested documents which are filed by institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act compliance requirements are strongly used by both international and domestic law enforcement agencies to detect, deter, and identify money laundering from occurring whether the activity is in continuance of terrorism, tax evasion, criminal enterprise, or other illegal activity.
The Bank Secrecy Act was passed originally in 1970 by the United States Congress. Since then it has been amended many times, for example to include the provisions found in title III which is found in the USA Patriot Act.
The Provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970
In order for the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training to help prevent money laundering in the financial industry, the Act requires all financial institution to maintain detailed records regarding cash purchases as well as file reports regarding cash purchase of negotiable instruments that are no less than $10,000. Any purchases or transactions that are $10,000 or more from one customer must be reported to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Department of the Treasury. More specifically, these transactions are reported if one is above the minimum limit, or multiple related transactions are greater than or equal to $10,000 and happen within a 24-hour period.
These transactions must also be done in cash, meaning they are in a currency (both bills and coins) made from either the United States or other countries, or if they are a monetary instrument defined in the Bank Secrecy Act, such as bank drafts, cashier’s checks, money orders, or traveler’s checks. Personal checks do not apply to this definition of cash.
Furthermore, under the Bank Secrecy Act, these companies are also obligated to report any suspicious activity that may imply tax evasion, money laundering, or any other criminal activities on the part of a company. Because of the Bank Secrecy Act, many banks have ceased selling negotiable instruments the instruments are bought with cash, and instead require the purchase to be taken out from an account at the given institution.
An activity is thought to be suspicious if the transaction involves $5,000 or more in assets or funds that the financial institution thinks may possibly indicate a profit derived from an illegal activity or transacted with the intent of hiding an illegal activity. Besides traditional financial institutions like brokers or banks, there are many other institutions that are required to report any activity that is suspicious under the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, such as casinos, businesses that redeem or issue money orders, and dealers who deal gemstones or precious metals.
Affected Transactions under the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970
There are three major transactions that are affected under the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training.
Currency Transaction Report 
A currency transaction report, or CTR, is a report that must show all cash transactions that exceeded $10,000 within the same business day. The value or amount that exceeds $10,000 should be either in one single transaction or in a combination of related cash transactions. These currency transaction reports are filed with the records of the Internal Revenue Service.
Monetary Instrument Log 
The monetary instrument log must explicitly state the cash purchases involved for monetary instruments, for example cashier’s checks, travelers checks, and money orders, that have a value totaling inclusively between $3,000 to $10,000. A Monetary instrument log form is needed to be maintained on the record at the financial institution, and should be produced at the request of an examiner or audit to verify the institution’s compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training. A financial institution must also maintain this log for at least 5 years.
Suspicious Activity Report
The suspicious activity report must report any transaction made with cash where the customer appears to be trying to make an active effort to avoid the reporting requirements placed by the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training by not filing any currency transaction reports or monetary instrument logs. An example of when a suspicious activity report must be used if the actions of a customer suggest that he or she is laundering money or in some other way violating a federal criminal law while committing wire transfer fraud, check fraud or other mysterious disappearances. A bank must not let a customer know that a suspicious activity report is being filed against them. These suspicious activity reports are filed by the banks with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.

The Effect of Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 on United States Citizens
Currency transaction reports include the bank account number, name, social security number, and address of the individual. The suspicious activity reports, which are required by the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training when transactions suggest suspicious behavior that try to elude currency transaction reports (or other types of suspicious behavior), include a bit more detailed information and typically contain efforts of covert investigation on behalf of the financial institution in order to gauge the nature or validity of the transactions.
One single currency transaction report filed for the account of a client is usually not concerning to the law enforcement authorities, but multiple currency transaction reports that come from different institutions or a suspicious activity report can suggest that the activity might be suspicious.
Under the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training, a financial institution cannot inform a consumer or business that a suspicious activity report is being filed against them. In addition, all the reports that are mandated by the Bank Secrecy Act are exempt from having to be disclosed according to the provisions found in the Freedom of Information Act.
Businesses that primarily deal in cash, such as restaurants or bars, can be exempted from the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training’s policy of having their withdrawals and deposits reported on currency transaction reports, although the exemption is hardly ever granted. Instead, many banks have computer systems that can retain information on currency transaction reports and allow duplicate currency transaction reports to be easily created.

Individual filing requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970
Under the Bank Secrecy Act regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act training, a United States citizen must file a FBAR if the individual has had a financial authority over, or interest in a foreign bank account that at any point in a year has an aggregate value of $10,000. Furthermore, a citizen must report this account on the Schedule B portion of the Internal Revenue Service’s Form 1040. The required FBAR should be separately filed with the United States Treasury before June 30.

Coercive Acts

Coercive Acts



The Six Coercive Acts of 1774
The Coercive Acts of 1774, sometimes called the Intolerable Acts, are names given to describe a set of laws that were passed by Great Britain’s Parliament in 1774 which related to colonies in North America that were under British control. These acts caused resistance and outrage in the North American Thirteen Colonies which later gained their independence to become the United States, and were extremely crucial developments in the development of the American Revolution.
Four of the Coercive Acts of 1774 were created in by the Parliament as a direct response to the Boston Tea Party which occurred in December of 1773.  Great Britain’s Parliament created these acts in hopes that the punitive measures could make an example out of Massachusetts and reverse the ongoing trend of resistance from the colonies against parliamentary authority that was exerted by Great Britain starting from the Stamp Act of 1765. The Quebec Act, the fifth of the Coercive Acts of 1774, enlarged the boundaries of the Province of Quebec and set up reforms that were generally more favorable to the inhabitants of the region who were French Catholic.
Many North American colonists looked at the Coercive Acts of 1774 as a completely arbitrary violation of their rights by Great Britain, and in 1774 the colonists set up the First Continental Congress in order to coordinate a protest against them. As tensions intensified, the Revolutionary War broke out the year after, ultimately leading to the formation of an independent country, the United States of America. 


Background Environment of the Coercive Acts of 1774
Relations between the Kingdom of Great Britain and the Thirteen Colonies steadily worsened after Seven Years’ War ended in 1763. The war had pushed the British government into debt, resulting in the British Parliament enacting a series of acts in order to increase tax revenue received from the North American colonies. Great Britain’s Parliament felt that these imposed acts, for example the 1765 Stamp Act and the 1767 Townshend Acts, were a legitimate way of having the American colonies pay their share of the expenses of upholding the British Empire. Although objections led to the repeal of both the Townshend and Stamp Acts, the British Parliament maintained the position that the empire had the right over the colonies to legislate in all cases according to the Declaratory Act of 1766.
However, many colonists had established an altered idea of the British Empire. The colonists argued that under the British Constitution, the property of a British subject (taxes in this case) could not legally be taken without his consent (which in this case was form of proper representation in the government). Consequently, because the North American colonies were not represented directly in Parliament, many colonists claimed that Parliament did not have the right to levy taxes upon the colonies. The colonists expressed this view through the slogan “No taxation without representation”.
Once Parliament enacted the Townshend Acts, many essayists in the colonies took this slogan further and started to question whether the British Parliament had any genuine jurisdiction over the colonies in the first place. This doubt of how far Parliament’s sovereignty went in the American colonies was the primary issue underlying what developed into the American Revolution.
The Acts of the Coercive Acts of 1774
In December of 1773, a crowd of colonists ruined tons of tea from the East India Company in Boston, Massachusetts as an act later called the Boston Tea Party. This response by the colonists were in response to Parliament taking away the taxes previously in place for tea distributed to the North American colonies by the British East India Company as a way to save the company going bankrupt.
This act by Parliament resulted in tea that was less expensive in comparison to colonial tea, nearly creating a monopoly, and endangering the financial welfare of many of the traders and business men of the colony. News regarding the Boston Tea Party reached Great Britain by January of 1774. The British Parliament responded to the event with the Coercive acts that were meant to be punishment for destroying private property, reestablish British authority, and reform government in colonial America.
The Boston Port Act
The Boston Port Act was the first Coercive Act passed by Parliament after the Boston Tea Party, which closed the port of Boston until after the East India Company was repaid the value of the destroyed tea and once the king was content that order in the colonies was been restored. Colonists protested that the Port Act penalized all of Boston instead of just the persons who had ruined the tea, and that everyone was being disciplined without a chance to defend their side.

The Massachusetts Government Act
The Massachusetts Government Act triggered even more anger than the first Coercive act because the act one-sidedly changed the government of Massachusetts in order to place it under the British government. According to the Act, nearly all positions in the North American colonial government were designated by the king or the governor. The second Coercive act also harshly limited the town meetings in Massachusetts to just one meeting a year, unless specifically called for by the Governor. North American colonists outside Massachusetts became worried that their colonial governments could soon be changed through Parliament’s legislation. 
The Administration of Justice Act
The Administration of Justice Act was the third Coercive act of 1774, where the governor moved trials of royal officials who were accused to other colonies or even back to Great Britain if he felt the official would not receive a fair trial in Massachusetts. Even though the act specified that witnesses would have to pay for their own travel expenses, very few colonists could actually afford do because it would require them to take a leave from work and travel, sometimes across an ocean in order to testify. This Coercive act effectively allowed British officials to harass colonial Americans and escape justice afterwards.

The Quartering Act
The Quartering Act was a Coercive act placed on all of the colonies in North America, and worked to make a more efficient way of housing British troops who were stationed in America. A previous act forced colonies to provide housing, but many colonial legislatures had been very uncooperative. The new Quartering Act gave the governor authority to house the soldiers in other buildings in the colony if quarters were not provided. Although many colonists felt that the Quartering Act were objectionable, this Coercive act produced the least objection out of all the Coercive Acts of 1774.

The Quebec Act
The Quebec Act was legislation that was completely unrelated to the Boston Tea Party, and is sometimes not considered a part of the Coercive Acts of 1774. The act was passed in a time that led colonists to think that the act was in place to punish the colonies. The Quebec act extended the boundaries of the Province of Quebec and introduced reforms generally advantageous to the French Catholic residents of the region, although they were denied an elected legislative assembly. The Quebec act eliminated mentions to the Protestant faith from the allegiance’s oath, and guaranteed that there could be free practice for Roman Catholics. The Quebec Act insulted a variety of different interest groups in the colonies. Land settlers and speculators protested to the allocation of western lands formerly claimed by the American colonies to the non-representative government. Many colonists feared the formation of Catholicism in Quebec, and that British Americans would be oppressed by the French Canadians.

Attorneys, Get Listed

X